🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."