🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, following a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to establish other types of electoral districts – including rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.