🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.